Friday, May 10, 2019

Who is this Joan person?

I've been teaching my students to vet sources, so I clearly needed to do some research on Joan Thormann after reading her article "Encouraging Online Learner Participation."  I could not simply rely on the brief description that she "is a professor in the Division of Educational Technology at Lesley University and coauthor of The Complete Step-by-Step Guide to Designing and Teaching Online Courses."  Besides, this article was from 2014, so I wanted to know what else this mysterious "Joan" had done.

Here's what I found from Magna Publications:

  • She's been developing and teaching online courses since 1996.
  • She worked for an educational software company.
  • She developed, implemented, and directed projects relating to technology for students with special needs.
  • She's presented at over 100 conferences nationally and internationally.
  • She edits a column on technology and special needs.
  • She holds a PhD in special education and philosophy from the University or Oregon.
Joan checks out.

And her vast experience helps explain why her article was by far my favorite one of everything we read for Module 1.

I love reading and learning about different subjects, but I often become frustrated when books and articles tell you what to do without offering any insight onto how to do it.  I also don't like a "one size fits all approach," as if every personal experience can be directly applied to diverse contexts and situations.  So it should not be a surprise that I appreciate when people simply share their experiences and allow the reader to make their own connections and applications.

I loved that Dr. Thormann spoke of how she uses discussions as assignments rather than assigning an overall participation grade.  I love that she reflected on why she believes that The Coffee Shop is a helpful forum.  I loved how she identified go-getters and how they can be utilized as catalysts.  I loved how she broke down the responsibilities she assigns student moderators. And I loved that her straight-forward writing helped me make connections between her online classroom experiences and my own face-to-face classroom experiences.

My biggest take-away came from her section on using student moderators. I used to do this all the time when I was a youth pastor, assigning students leadership roles for facilitating discussion. When I read her praise for how student moderators bring a different perspective to the course, I thought, "Yes!  I've seen this!"  And I immediately thought, "I can do this in my face-to-face classroom again and online!  I know how to do this!"

So I'm grateful to this formerly-mysterious Joan for sharing her experiences in a way that I was able to make connections to my own experience in a way that will hopefully benefit my current and future students.

5 comments:

  1. Lauren - I really like that article as well. I did have an LOL moment when she said to "recognize the go-getters." In my Masters program I was always the first to post, the first to comment, and worked SO HARD to make sure I was doing more than enough to meet the criteria (it's harder to know you made an important contribution online vs in a classroom setting when you can see people's reactions). But I had a professor who was a bit cold and no matter what, would point out an additional resource I could have located or cited, a point from the reading I could have referenced, or soemthing else that could have been explored. While I understand that he was trying to guide and furhter the conversation, but it would have been really nice to be recognized at some point for my contributions (along with the 4-5 of us who kind of led the class). Something I will need to keep in mind when I teach!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Good for you for being a go-getter! I'm sorry the one professor didn't seem to acknowledge contributions, but I guess the positive side of that situation is that you now have a great comparison tool to know how to affirm people better than you were affirmed! Thanks for sharing your online experiences; it's been really great to compare real life experiences to our readings and reflections.

      Delete
    2. Thanks for sharing your personal experience. I know I struggle as an instructor with my own personality weaknesses. I have to intentionally remember the "compliment sandwich" and to not grade students according to the "perfect response" in my head. These are good reminders for myself.

      Delete
  2. I really liked this idea of student moderators as well. I'm still thinking about how to incorporate this with technical content. I've used roles in team work in the past (Manager, Recorder, Scribe, Clarifier). Maybe there is a similar idea for an online class discussion, someone who for instance is assigned the role of collecting/highlighting questions: it can be easier to say "someone" has a question over voicing your own questions.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I have tried using student moderators for online discussions, but I found that my 5-week course just wasn't long enough for me to make the best use of this format. It took time just for students to decide on issues and then how to frame them, and I wanted to approve before anything was posted. Then they had to facilitate, which proved difficult because of schedules - some checked in 4 days a week, some more, some less, and it just became too much for the time we had.

    ReplyDelete